2007 Toyota Tundra vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2007 Toyota Tundra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota Tundra (271 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Toyota Tundra (424 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Toyota Tundra | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Toyota | Triumph |
Model | Tundra | 2000 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4664 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 424 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5820 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3710 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 64 L |