2007 Toyota Tundra vs. 2013 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2013 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln Navigator (306 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2007 Toyota Tundra. (271 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2007 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2007 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Lincoln Navigator. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lincoln Navigator (495 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Toyota Tundra. (424 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2013 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Toyota Tundra | 2013 Lincoln Navigator | |
Make | Toyota | Lincoln |
Model | Tundra | Navigator |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4664 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 424 Nm | 495 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5820 mm | 5293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2332 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1988 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3710 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 106 L |