2008 Acura RDX vs. 2004 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2008 Acura RDX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Acura RDX (240 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (195 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Acura RDX should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 772 kg more than 2008 Acura RDX.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 353 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Acura RDX | 2004 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
Model | RDX | Express |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 2222 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 117 L |