2008 Acura RDX vs. 2011 Holden Calais
To start off, 2011 Holden Calais is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Acura RDX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Acura RDX would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2008 Acura RDX. (240 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2008 Acura RDX.
Because 2008 Acura RDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Acura RDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Acura RDX (353 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 2008 Acura RDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Calais.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Acura RDX | 2011 Holden Calais | |
Make | Acura | Holden |
Model | RDX | Calais |
Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 353 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |