2008 Acura RL vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2008 Acura RL is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Acura RL (290 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Acura RL weights approximately 805 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Acura RL (347 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Acura RL | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Acura | Zastava |
| Model | RL | 102 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 3471 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 347 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2160 mm |
