2008 Acura TL vs. 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 2008 Acura TL is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Acura TL (286 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Acura TL weights approximately 52 kg more than 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Acura TL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Acura TL | 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
Model | TL | 6C |
Year Released | 2008 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3471 cc | 2443 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2710 mm |