2008 Acura TL vs. 1952 Buick 40
To start off, 2008 Acura TL is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Acura TL (258 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40.
Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Acura TL (316 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Acura TL | 1952 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Acura | Buick |
| Model | TL | 40 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3210 cc | 4066 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 258 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 316 Nm | 292 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3090 mm |
