2008 Acura TL vs. 1956 Riley RM A
To start off, 2008 Acura TL is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Acura TL weights approximately 217 kg more than 1956 Riley RM A.
Because 2008 Acura TL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Acura TL | 1956 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Acura | Riley |
| Model | TL | RM A |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 3471 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2870 mm |
