2008 Acura TL vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 2008 Acura TL is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2008 Acura TL. (258 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2008 Acura TL.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Acura TL | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
Model | TL | Caprice |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 6476 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 258 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3030 mm |