2008 Acura TL vs. 1972 Rover 3.5
To start off, 2008 Acura TL is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover 3.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Acura TL (258 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1972 Rover 3.5. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1972 Rover 3.5.
Because 1972 Rover 3.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rover 3.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Acura TL (316 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Rover 3.5. (276 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2008 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Rover 3.5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Acura TL | 1972 Rover 3.5 | |
| Make | Acura | Rover |
| Model | TL | 3.5 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3210 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 258 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 316 Nm | 276 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2820 mm |
