2008 Acura TL vs. 1981 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2008 Acura TL is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 88 kg more than 2008 Acura TL.
Because 2008 Acura TL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 2008 Acura TL has manual transmission. 2008 Acura TL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Acura TL | 1981 Chrysler Le Baron | |
| Make | Acura | Chrysler |
| Model | TL | Le Baron |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3471 cc | 3678 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2870 mm |
