2008 Acura TL vs. 1999 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2008 Acura TL is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan Cima weights approximately 256 kg more than 2008 Acura TL.
Because 1999 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Acura TL | 1999 Nissan Cima | |
| Make | Acura | Nissan |
| Model | TL | Cima |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3471 cc | 2998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1274 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1770 mm |
