2008 Acura TL vs. 2001 Cadillac LMP
To start off, 2008 Acura TL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac LMP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac LMP would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2008 Acura TL. (286 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 2008 Acura TL.
Because 2001 Cadillac LMP is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Cadillac LMP. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Acura TL. (347 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Acura TL | 2001 Cadillac LMP | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | TL | LMP |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3471 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 347 Nm | 401 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3090 mm |
