2008 Alfa Romeo Brera vs. 1963 Alpine A 110
To start off, 2008 Alfa Romeo Brera is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Alfa Romeo Brera is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Alfa Romeo Brera weights approximately 895 kg more than 1963 Alpine A 110.
Because 1963 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Alfa Romeo Brera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Alfa Romeo Brera | 1963 Alpine A 110 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Alpine |
Model | Brera | A 110 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 72 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 38 L |