2008 Alfa Romeo Spider vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 2008 Alfa Romeo Spider is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Alfa Romeo Spider weights approximately 5 kg more than 1968 Jaguar E Type.
Because 1968 Jaguar E Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar E Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Alfa Romeo Spider, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Alfa Romeo Spider | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | Spider | E Type |
Year Released | 2008 | 1968 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 226 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 106 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1190 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 63 L |