2008 Alpina B3 vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2008 Alpina B3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,346 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Alpina B3 (301 HP) has 146 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 61 kg more than 2008 Alpina B3.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Alpina B3 (362 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm). This means 2008 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Alpina B3 | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Alpina | Mercury |
Model | B3 | Sable |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3346 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 362 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93.8 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |