2008 Audi A3 vs. 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 2008 Audi A3 is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 336 kg more than 2008 Audi A3.
Because 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A3 | 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Audi | Alfa Romeo |
Model | A3 | 6C |
Year Released | 2008 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1164 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 77 L |