2008 Audi A3 vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2008 Audi A3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A3 weights approximately 377 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A3 (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi A3 | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Audi | Reliant |
| Model | A3 | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 798 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 38 L |
