2008 Audi A3 vs. 1965 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2008 Audi A3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A3 weights approximately 538 kg more than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Because 1965 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A3 (200 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A3 | 1965 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Audi | ZAZ |
Model | A3 | 966 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Torque | 200 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 72.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 54.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1278 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2170 mm |