2008 Audi A3 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker

To start off, 2008 Audi A3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Audi A3 (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A3 weights approximately 227 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A3 (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Audi A3 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
Make Audi Chevrolet
Model A3 Tracker
Year Released 2008 2004
Body Type Hatchback SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1999 cc 1590 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 97 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 281 Nm 139 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82.5 mm 84.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92.8 mm 75 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.3:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1545 kg 1318 kg
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4140 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1670 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2210 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.9 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 61 L