2008 Audi A3 vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2008 Audi A3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2008 Audi A3. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2008 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1095 kg more than 2008 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi A3. (281 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A3 | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A3 | E-250 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1981 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 389 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 132 L |