2008 Audi A3 vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2008 Audi A3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Audi A3 (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki XL7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 205 kg more than 2008 Audi A3.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A3 (320 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 2008 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A3 | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Audi | Suzuki |
Model | A3 | XL7 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1455 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 64 L |