2008 Audi A3 vs. 2004 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2008 Audi A3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 460 kg more than 2008 Audi A3.
Because 2004 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Mark II (200 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi A3. (170 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2004 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A3 | 2004 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A3 | Mark II |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
Torque | 170 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 72 L |