2008 Audi A3 vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2008 Audi A3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Matrix would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 185 kg more than 2008 Audi A3.
Because 2005 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A3 (170 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (161 Nm). This means 2008 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A3 | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A3 | Matrix |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 170 Nm | 161 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |