2008 Audi A3 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Evanda
To start off, 2008 Audi A3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Evanda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Evanda would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Evanda weights approximately 192 kg more than 2008 Audi A3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A3 (200 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda. (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A3 | 2006 Chevrolet Evanda | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | A3 | Evanda |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 200 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1497 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |