2008 Audi A4 vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 2008 Audi A4 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A4 weights approximately 319 kg more than 1949 Hudson Commodore.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi A4 | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | Audi | Hudson |
| Model | A4 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 6.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3160 mm |
