2008 Audi A4 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2008 Audi A4 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 665 kg more than 2008 Audi A4.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi A4. (195 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A4 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A4 | 62 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Torque | 195 Nm | 582 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 98.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |