2008 Audi A4 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2008 Audi A4 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 655 kg more than 2008 Audi A4.
Because 1963 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi A4 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A4 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 6390 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 2140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |
