2008 Audi A4 vs. 1963 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 2008 Audi A4 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A4 weights approximately 158 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1963 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A4 (225 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A4 | 1963 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | Audi | Isuzu |
Model | A4 | Bellel |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1991 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 55 HP |
Torque | 225 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1332 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2540 mm |