2008 Audi A4 vs. 1966 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2008 Audi A4 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,968 cc, 2008 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A4 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1966 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1966 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A4 (321 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Bluebird. (89 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A4 | 1966 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A4 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 1189 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 47 HP |
Torque | 321 Nm | 89 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2390 mm |