2008 Audi A4 vs. 1982 Buick LeSabre
To start off, 2008 Audi A4 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 200 kg more than 2008 Audi A4.
Because 1982 Buick LeSabre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Buick LeSabre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Buick LeSabre (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi A4. (195 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1982 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi A4 | 1982 Buick LeSabre | |
| Make | Audi | Buick |
| Model | A4 | LeSabre |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2950 mm |
