2008 Audi A4 vs. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Audi A4 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 384 kg more than 2008 Audi A4.
Because 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Audi A4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee (295 Nm @ 3050 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi A4. (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A4 | 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | A4 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 3956 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 188 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 295 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3050 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 98.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 86.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1834 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 87 L |