2008 Audi A6 vs. 1951 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 212 kg more than 2008 Audi A6.
Because 1951 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi A6. (331 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 1951 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A6 | 62 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3123 cc | 5422 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 331 Nm | 423 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 96.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 92.1 mm |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 145 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1752 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3210 mm |