2008 Audi A6 vs. 1952 Austin A 40
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,976 cc, 2008 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A6 weights approximately 535 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A6 (301 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 1952 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | A6 | A 40 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1952 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 1199 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 41 HP |
Torque | 301 Nm | 79 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 65.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 89 mm |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 113 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2360 mm |