2008 Audi A6 vs. 1961 Austin A 40
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,123 cc, 2008 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A6 weights approximately 780 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40.
Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A6 (331 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 1961 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | A6 | A 40 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3123 cc | 948 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 36 HP |
Torque | 331 Nm | 68 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 64.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 76.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2220 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 45 L |