2008 Audi A6 vs. 1964 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,976 cc, 2008 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A6 weights approximately 505 kg more than 1964 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Audi A6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A6 (301 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jeep CJ5. 2008 Audi A6 has automatic transmission and 1964 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Audi A6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi A6 | 1964 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | A6 | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2976 cc | 2197 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 301 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2060 mm |
