2008 Audi A6 vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,975 cc, 2008 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | A6 | Elan |
Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 1558 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 45 L |