2008 Audi A6 vs. 1967 Holden HR
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 3,048 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Holden HR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A6 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1967 Holden HR.
Because 1967 Holden HR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Holden HR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A6 (301 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Holden HR. (245 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Holden HR.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi A6 | 1967 Holden HR | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | A6 | HR |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2976 cc | 3048 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 301 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2700 mm |
