2008 Audi A6 vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,393 cc, 2008 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A6 weights approximately 697 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2008 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Riley Kestrel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A6 (230 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | A6 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 1098 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 888 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 25 L |