2008 Audi A6 vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,975 cc, 2008 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A6 weights approximately 625 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A6 (300 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi A6 | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Audi | Riley |
| Model | A6 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 2975 cc | 1275 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 25 L |
