2008 Audi A6 vs. 1976 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 2,976 cc, 2008 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A6 weights approximately 335 kg more than 1976 Datsun 280Z.
Because 1976 Datsun 280Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Datsun 280Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A6 (300 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Datsun 280Z.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 1976 Datsun 280Z | |
Make | Audi | Datsun |
Model | A6 | 280Z |
Year Released | 2008 | 1976 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 2753 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4399 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2304 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |