2008 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Buick LeSabre
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 50 kg more than 2008 Audi A6.
Because 1982 Buick LeSabre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Buick LeSabre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A6 (331 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Buick LeSabre. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Buick LeSabre.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 1982 Buick LeSabre | |
Make | Audi | Buick |
Model | A6 | LeSabre |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3123 cc | 3791 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 331 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2950 mm |