2008 Audi A6 vs. 1983 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,590 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 125 kg more than 2008 Audi A6.
Because 1983 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Jaguar XJS (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi A6. (301 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1983 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi A6 | 1983 Jaguar XJS | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | A6 | XJS |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2976 cc | 3590 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 226 HP |
| Torque | 301 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 92 mm |
| Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 229 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2600 mm |
