2008 Audi A6 vs. 1996 Caterham 7
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 2,975 cc, 2008 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A6 weights approximately 1057 kg more than 1996 Caterham 7.
Because 1996 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A6 (300 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Caterham 7. (156 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 1996 Caterham 7 | |
Make | Audi | Caterham |
Model | A6 | 7 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 1588 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 203 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 36 L |