2008 Audi A6 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A6 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio.
Because 2008 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi A6. (230 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi A6. 2008 Audi A6 has automatic transmission and 2003 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2003 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Audi A6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | A6 | Clio |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 2946 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 232 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |