2008 Audi A6 vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 2,976 cc, 2008 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 48 kg more than 2008 Audi A6.
Because 2004 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Audi A6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A6 (301 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (271 Nm). This means 2008 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A6 | Tribute |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 2966 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 201 HP |
Torque | 301 Nm | 271 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1583 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 62 L |