2008 Audi A6 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,976 cc, 2008 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A6 weights approximately 795 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2004 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A6 (301 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade. 2008 Audi A6 has automatic transmission and 2004 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2004 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Audi A6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Audi | MCC |
Model | A6 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 599 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 301 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 1810 mm |