2008 Audi A6 vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Audi A6 (168 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 238 kg more than 2008 Audi A6.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A6 (280 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm). This means 2008 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | A6 | Sable |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |