2008 Audi A6 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,976 cc, 2008 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A6 weights approximately 550 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A6 (301 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 2004 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | A6 | Colt |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 1322 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 301 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 75.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |