2008 Audi A6 vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 245 kg more than 2008 Audi A6.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A6 (300 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Tundra. (298 Nm). This means 2008 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A6 | Tundra |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 3376 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 100 L |